BigClassActions.com

Cell Phone Termination Fees - New Legislation Proposed

- by

Biloxi, MSConsumers are becoming more and more frustrated with unfair and ridiculously high cell phone termination fees charged even when contracts are canceled because a cell phone company fails to provide proper service.

Some legislators are starting to fight against the improper charging of termination fees, but until legislation is passed, consumers will be stuck paying expensive termination fees in order to end their relationship with cell phone carriers that sometimes cannot even provide consistent cell phone service in the customer's own home.

When Jon Ross signed a contract for his cell phones in the spring of 2006, he didn't know that, in less than three months, he would have to pay $400 in early termination fees to cancel his contract, even though it was canceled because of poor cell phone service.

Jon says he researched cell phone carriers on the internet and chose T-Mobile because it had the best coverage in his area. "When you go to the website there is a coverage map. In my area, the coverage shows three bars which I thought was pretty good so I decided to go with T-Mobile."

However, Jon soon discovered that he wasn't receiving any cell phone service in his home.
He phoned T-Mobile to find out what the problem was. As it turned out, three bars on the coverage map actually mean that a customer should be able to make calls outdoors or in a car but may not have service in some buildings. "You have to run the mouse over their map legend to learn what the bars mean," Jon says. "But it doesn't say that anywhere on the website. It's not obvious that you have to do that. I thought three bars meant good coverage, but it actually meant that I couldn't use my cell phone in my own house."

Because his cell phone was important to business, Jon canceled his contract with T-Mobile. T-Mobile charged him $400 for early termination fees, even though Jon could barely use his cell phones indoors. "I didn't pay that right away," Jon says. "At first I paid the full bill for my use, but not the cancellation fee. Their service was terrible so why should I pay it? Finally they threatened me with collections so I had to pay the $400 or it would affect my credit."

Although it will not help Jon in Mississippi, proposed legislation may help Massachusetts consumers fight such ridiculous cell phone termination fees. Michael W. Morrissey, state Senate chairman of the Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy has proposed legislation that would make cell phone companies more accountable to customers.

In addition to forcing companies to issue regular reports detailing signal strength, dead zones, gaps in coverage and number of dropped calls (calls that end unexpectedly because of technical problems), the legislation would give customers like Jon who suffer from poor service the ability to end their contract without paying large termination fees. Instead, consumers would pay a pro-rated amount of the early termination fee, determined based on how long they have had service.

Customers would be eligible for this pro-rated termination fee if they had made five or more complaints in a month. Once they have done this they would be able to cancel their contract.

Cell phone termination fees can run anywhere from $170 to $300 and customers are usually required to pay the full amount, regardless of whether or not they are canceling their contract based on poor service.

Late in 2006, Verizon Wireless became the first national cell phone company to pro-rate its early termination fee. The fee starts at $175 but is reduced by $5 for every month under the contract the customer completes.

Last year, Verizon Wireless settled a class-action suit claiming that the company over-billed customers and engaged in deceptive business practices. Customers who were involved in the lawsuit received two vouchers in the mail for discounts on various Verizon products and services. Verizon was also required to make its fees and charges more clear to customers and eliminate previous charges that consumer advocates felt were unfair.

Other cell phone companies are now facing lawsuits arguing that early termination fees are illegal. Those include a lawsuit against T-Mobile USA, filed in November, 2006, which claims that T-Mobile's $200 early termination fee violates consumer protection laws in 13 states.

Cell Phone Companies Legal Help

If you have been charged undisclosed termination fees, please contact a [Cell Phone Companies] lawyer who will evaluate your claim at no charge.

Reader Comments

Posted by

on
I Hope that this works because I also have no service in my house. I miss calls, voicemail pops up when my phone doesn't even ring and it rejects messages. It took me six times and twenty minutes to even call out to complain to customer service and they said that there is nothing they can do, no money off my bill, no added services for free ( like they would work anyway), and i have been a customer for three years. I am appalled that i pay them 140 dollars a month and i miss calls. my husband is also on my plan and self employed and has missed many business calls, i have threatened to shut off my service and switch to verizon but the $400 termination fee, well i just cant afford. And in my opinion if they don't give good service i should be able to cancel for free at anytime i choose. They are making rediculous amounts of money off of us anyway.

Add Your Comment on This Story

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

*Your Comment:
Request Legal Help