BigClassActions.com

Ford Fuel Economy Rating Lawsuit

- by

Ford announced in February 2019 that its fuel economy ratings were not accurate on some of its vehicles due to its fuel economy testing procedures. As a result of the automaker’s admittedly flawed testing, a Ford Fuel Economy class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of consumers who claim their vehicle is getting mileage per gallon (MPG) substantially different than the MPG advertised.

Ford Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Class Action Lawsuit

The fuel economy class action lawsuit alleges that the automaker marketed and sold or leased certain 2017-2019 vehicle models with fuel economy ratings that were overstated and failed to disclose this information to its customers. If you owned or leased or presently own or lease a Ford vehicle model years 2017-2019 , you may be entitled to compensation if the advertised fuel mileage economy was overstated by Ford.

This class action lawsuit states that plaintiffs have been damaged by Ford’s misrepresentations, concealment, and non-disclosure of the MPG metrics, because they were misled into leasing or purchasing vehicles of a quality different than they were promised, therefore paying higher fuel costs they would not otherwise have paid.

According to the class action lawsuit, Ford has admitted that its testing methods were incorrect and produced artificially high fuel economy ratings. “Ford knows that consumers are concerned with fuel economy and rising fuel prices, and markets its inflated fuel economy claims to entice consumers to buy or lease Ford vehicles instead of those of its competitors.” The complaint is Case 1:19-cv-03794 Document 1 Filed 06/28/19.

(Fuel economy of an automobile relates distance traveled by a vehicle to the amount of fuel consumed. This is typically expressed in terms of gallons of gasoline consumed to distance traveled in miles. MPG is calculated by dividing the number of miles traveled by the amount of gasoline consumed to travel such miles.)
 

Fuel Economy Testing and the EPA

Fuel economy ratings are vital to automotive manufacturers as they have a significant impact on sales. The vehicle manufacturer is responsible for fuel economy testing in its own laboratories in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) standardized laboratory test procedures and must report the results to the EPA.

The EPA reviews the results and confirms about 15-20 percent through its own testing. The EPA re-tests some models selected randomly while others are tested again because of consumer complaints. Although the EPA only sets guidelines, it can investigate and require an automaker to hire a third party. According to the lawsuit, inaccurate fuel economy ratings did not comply with federal regulations.

The EPA was notified by Ford that a third party was hired to investigate its fuel economy and testing procedures – the main concern is whether it miscalculated “road load” specifications used for testing. If the road load (the force put on a vehicle while driving at a constant speed over a level surface.) is too light, it could result in better fuel economy than stated.

Ford told Reuters that since late 2018 it has been investigating concerns raised by employees (referred to by the Center for Automotive Research as “whistleblowers”) that incorrect calculations were used to translate test results into the mileage and emissions data submitted to regulators. The automaker was looking into processes it uses to develop fuel economy and emissions figures, "including engineering, technical and governance components."

The investigation began with the 2019 Ford Ranger, which has been advertised as “the most fuel-efficient gas-powered midsize pickup in America”, with a best-in-class EPA-estimated 23-miles-per-gallon combined fuel economy. Reuters reported in April that Ford is under criminal investigation by the U.S. Justice Department and a class action lawsuit followed, alleging that Ford deceived customers about the mileage of its 2019 Ranger, along with other vehicles.

This isn’t the first time that Ford has made incorrect fuel economy claims. In 2014, Ford lowered fuel economy ratings for six other models and offered compensation to customers, reported Detroit News (Apr 2019).

Attorneys are currently investigating nationwide other Ford vehicles after consumers have complained that their leased or purchased car with stated EPA fuel economy ratings and advertised fuel efficiency ratings were inaccurate.
 

Inaccurate Ford Fuel Eonomy Rating Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages, please fill in our form on the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Last updated August 19 2020

Reader Comments


Posted by

on
This pertains only for bc bffthe newer F 150 trucks?
Mine is a 2005.

Posted by

on
Interviewed by Bloomberg, published 11/13/13

Both Consumer Reports and Ford disagree with that decision to keep current tests for hybrids -- and so does Christine Hanson, a 62-year-old semi-retired legal worker in Tacoma, Washington. She and her husband paid $35,000 for a Ford C-Max hybrid in June, drawn by its 47 miles (76 kilometers) per gallon city and highway ratings.
Counting On Mileage. “Everything else that went along with it -- the handling, the extra cargo in the back -- that was all icing on the cake, "she said. The mileage she got was less, around 37 mpg, and she wasn’t alone.
_________________
I have a letter to the dealership dated prior to the date I purchased my CMax indicating the MPG was not as advertised and to inform customers. The dealership denied receiving the letter and sold me the car with the 47 MPG sticker (which I still have).

Add Your Comment on This Issue

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

*Your Comment:
Request Legal Help