The Adee complaint follows on the nearly five-year "Honeygate" investigation led by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigative arm of the US Department of Homeland Security and the investigation of the honey producers' own lawyers. The Honeygate investigation focused on a massive conspiracy through which participants transshipped Chinese honey through other countries, fraudulently disguised the transshipped honey's Chinese origin, and then illegally imported that honey into the United States in order to avoid paying US antidumping duties. The US Department of Commerce began imposing antidumping duties against Chinese honey after it had determined that honey imported from China was being sold at less than fair market value and injuring the domestic honey industry.
The government's Honeygate investigation culminated in a series of seizures of illegally imported honey, criminal charges, and massive fines. Most notably, the US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois filed criminal charges against two of the country's largest industrial honey suppliers, Groeb Farms, Inc. and Honey Solutions, in the wake of the Honeygate investigation. Earlier this year, both suppliers entered into Deferred Prosecution Agreements with the government and admitted to knowingly facilitating the importation, purchase and sale of mislabeled Chinese-origin honey in avoidance of US-imposed antidumping duties.
The Adee action builds on the Honeygate investigation in an attempt to obtain redress for all domestic honey producers injured as a result of Groeb's and Honey Solutions' conduct. The Adee action alleges Groeb Farms and Honey Solutions knowingly and intentionally purchased, packaged, distributed, and sold falsely labeled honey and, in doing so, have deceived consumers and purchasers as well as subjected those consumers to potential health risks.
The complaint further alleges that "illegally imported Chinese honey is also heavily adulterated, containing inexpensive sweeteners and sometimes blended with high fructose corn syrup and other additives, despite the fact that importers, in league with [Groeb and Honey Solutions], represent that it is pure honey." Moreover, the Adee complaint alleges that Groeb and Honey Solutions "continue to harm domestic producers of honey by dumping Chinese honey into the domestic market at below fair market prices."
An attorney representing the honey producers, James J. Pizzirusso of the Washington, D.C. office of Hausfeld LLP, stated: "The domestic honey industry, critically important to agriculture, has suffered losses at the hands of these fraudulent shippers for far too long. Through this class action, our clients seek to hold these entities responsible for the financial harm they have caused."
Another attorney for the plaintiffs, Adam J. Levitt , who is a director in the Chicago office of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A and head of its consumer practice group, added: "It is important that American beekeepers and honey producers get to play on a level playing field, untainted by this international transshipping scheme that has damaged them for far too long."
In addition to Mr. Pizzirusso and Mr. Levitt, the lawyers representing the honey producers in the Adee action include Kenneth B. Bell of the Pensacola, Fla. office of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse; Stephen H. Echsner and E. Samuel Geisler of the Pensacola, Fla. office of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz PLLC; and Daniel E. Gustafson of the Minneapolis office of Gustafson Gluek PLLC. The case is styled as: Adee Honey Farms et al. v. Groeb Farms, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-02922 ( N.D. Ill .).